Office of the VP for Research

Administrative Review and Approval of Proposals for External Support

Title: Administrative Review and Approval of Proposals for External Support
Policy Owner: Office of the Vice President for Research, Sponsored Program Services
Applies to: Principal Investigators and all others involved in the submission of a sponsored program proposal
Campus Applicability:  All campuses except for UConn Health
Effective Date: June 24, 2015
For More Information, Contact Sponsored Program Services
Contact Information: (860) 486-3622
Official Website: http://research.uconn.edu

PURPOSE

The timely submission of proposals for internal UConn review and approval allows for thoughtful consideration and review of sponsored project proposals for compliance with University, Federal, State and sponsor policies.  Additionally, Sponsored Program Services professionals review proposals against the administrative requirements of the sponsor’s announcement, including budgets and budget justifications to identify potential administrative or financial challenges to the success of the proposal.

POLICY

All proposal submissions seeking external support for research and other sponsored projects must be submitted to the Office of the Vice President for Research (OVPR) Sponsored Program Services (SPS) for review and approval prior to submission to an external sponsor, even when institutional sign-off is not required by the sponsor.

All letters-of-intent and pre-proposal submissions seeking external support for research and other sponsored projects must be submitted to Sponsored Program Services for review and approval prior to submission to an external sponsor if the signature of an authorized official, a detailed budget, or cost share commitment is required.

Proposals submitted without SPS approval may be administratively withdrawn or the offer of funding (award) may not be accepted if the submission is found to be non-compliant with University, Federal, State or sponsor policies.

SPS requests a minimum of five (5) business days prior to the agency or submission deadline for review and approval of the full proposal, internal forms and budget.

The University of Connecticut reserves the right to withdraw any proposal or refuse acceptance of any award that does not comply with this policy.

ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

The Director of Sponsored Programs and Faculty Services has overall responsibility for this policy.

The Principal Investigator accepts the responsibility for the timely submission of all proposals and pre-proposals that require SPS approval to SPS.

The Department Head, Center Director and/or Dean attests to the academic purposes of the proposed project and its appropriateness in terms of budget, committed effort, space and equipment.

The Director of Sponsored Programs and Faculty Services is the authorized signatory for all proposals for sponsored programs. In the absence of the designated official, arrangements are made to ensure timely signing by alternate University signatories.

Principal Investigators, Department Heads, Deans and other individuals as required are responsible for authorizing and signing internal processing documents, but are not authorized to sign a sponsored projects proposal as the institutional official on behalf of the University.

PROCEDURE/FORMS

See OVPR SPS website: Proposal Preparation & Submission Overview

ENFORCEMENT

Violations of this policy may result in appropriate disciplinary measures in accordance with University Laws and By-Laws, General Rules of Conduct for All University Employees, applicable collective bargaining agreements, and the University of Connecticut Student Code.

POLICY HISTORY

Policy created:  6/12/2008

Revised:           6/24/2015 (approved by the Vice President for Research)

 

Review of University of Connecticut-Related Companies by the Stem Cell Research Oversight (SCRO) Committe, Policy on

Title: Review of University of Connecticut-Related Companies by the Stem Cell Research Oversight (SCRO) Committe, Policy on
Policy Owner: Vice President for Research
Applies to: Other
Campus Applicability:
Effective Date: February 16, 2011
For More Information, Contact Vice President for Research
Contact Information: (860) 486-4164
Official Website: http://research.uconn.edu/

 

 

This policy is intended to define the role of the Stem Cell Research Oversight Committee (SCRO) in providing review and oversight of stem cell research performed by private companies affiliated with the University of Connecticut through its Technology Incubator Program (TIP) and/or the UConn Research & Development Corporation in collaboration with University of Connecticut faculty members. SCRO review shall be restricted to research projects conducted at UConn facilities.

The companies requesting review by SCRO shall be required to comply with SCRO policies for review and oversight and shall agree to follow all policies established by the TIP including:

  • Provisions for compliance with all University, State and Federal rules and regulations including those from Environmental Health and Safety (EHS) and, where appropriate, rules related to animal care, use of human subjects, embryonic and adult stem cells, other biomaterials, etc.
  • The rules for indemnification established by the UConn Research & Development Corporation as stated below:

Indemnification

  1. Indemnity.  _<company name>_ shall and shall cause any Sublicenseeto indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the state of Connecticut, the University of Connecticut, the University of Connecticut Health Center and its/their trustees, directors, officers, faculty, students, employees, and agents and their respective successors, heirs and assigns (the “Indemnitees”), against any liability, damage, loss, or expense (including reasonable attorneys fees and expenses) incurred by or imposed upon any of the Indemnitees in connection with any claims, suits, actions, demands or judgments arising out of any theory of liability (including without limitation actions in the form of tort, warranty, or strict liability and regardless of whether such action has any factual basis) concerning any product, process, or service that is made, used, sold, imported, or performed pursuant to any right or license granted under this Agreement.
  2. Procedures.  The Indemnitees agree to provide _<company name>_ and any Sublicensee with prompt written notice of any claim, suit, action, demand, or judgment for which indemnification is sought under this Agreement.  Any Sublicensee shall agree, at its own expense, to provide attorneys reasonably acceptable to UCONN to defend against any such claim.  The Indemnitees shall cooperate fully with _<company name>_ and any Sublicensee in such defense and will permit _<companyname>_ and any Sublicensee to conduct and control such defense and the disposition of such claim, suit, or action (including all decisions relative to litigation, appeal, and settlement); provided, however, that any Indemnitee shall have the right to retain its own counsel, at its own expense, if representation of such Indemnitee by the counsel retained by _<company name>_ and any Sublicensee would be inappropriate because of actual or potential differences in the interests of such Indemnitee and any other party represented by such counsel. _<company name>_ and any Sublicensee agrees to keep UCONN informed of the progress in the defense and disposition of such claim and to consult with UCONN with regard to any proposed settlement.

Restrictions of Publication Rights and Foreign Nationals in Sponsored Research Contracts

Title: Restrictions of Publication Rights and Foreign Nationals in Sponsored Research Contracts
Policy Owner: Vice President for Research and Graduate Faculty Council Executive Committee
Applies to: Faculty, Staff, Students, Others
Campus Applicability:
Effective Date:  April 6, 2004
For More Information, Contact Sponsored Program Services
Contact Information:  (860) 486-3619
Official Website: https://ovpr.uconn.edu/services/sps/proposals/

 

 

INTRODUCTION

This policy outlines the conditions under which UConn can accept restrictions on publication rights and foreign nationals in sponsored research contracts.  This policy is necessary because federal export control regulations (including International Traffic in Arms Regulations – ITAR) severely restricts all publication by PIs and carries severe sanctions.  Under these regulations federal agencies can withhold the right to publish, including a thesis.  Accordingly, the policy’s goal is to safeguard graduate students’ progress towards graduation while allowing them to gain valuable experience working on such sponsored research projects.

KEY ELEMENTS OF THE POLICY

A grant with restrictions on foreign nationals and publication rights can be accepted only if the following conditions are met:

1)      The Principal Investigator (P.I.) must show that graduate students will not be employed on the project for more than 6 months.  This determination will be made on a case-by-case basis and is not automatic.  Six months is the maximum appointment to be considered.  Furthermore, in the future similar work should be done by a technician or post-doc.

2)      The student must understand that the work cannot be part of his/her thesis because of the restrictions.  In addition, it is important that the student or post-doc understands that he/she cannot discuss the research with others in the lab and cannot allow anyone (besides the P.I.) access to the research data.   This information will be conveyed to each student and post-doc in a letter provided by the P.I.

3)      The P.I. must outline procedures to guarantee in writing that no other employee in the lab will have access to the data.  The PI must also guarantee that the work and resulting data will not be discussed in group meetings.

4)      The P.I., as well as each graduate student and post-doc, must sign the statements described in Sections 2 and 3 of this Policy.  OSP must get a signed copy of each statement before funds are released.

5)      The P.I. must be informed by OSP that the consequences of federal oversight on contracts with these restrictions can be severe, both for the individual and the institution.  The procedures outlined in this Policy are designed to protect him/her.

6)      The Associate Vice Provost may meet with the affected graduate student to ensure that he/she understands the Policy.

Technology Incubation Program Operation Policy

Title: Technology Incubation Program Operation Policy
Policy Owner: Office of the Vice President for Research
Applies to: Faculty, Staff and Students
Campus Applicability:  All campuses including UConn Health
Effective Date: December 7, 2016
For More Information, Contact Director of Innovation Programs
Contact Information: (860) 486-3010
Official Website: http://research.uconn.edu/technology-commercialization/resources-for-business/incubator-services/

REASON FOR POLICY

The University’s Technology Incubation Program (TIP) is designed to facilitate the commercialization of technology and promote new economic development opportunities in Connecticut by supporting technology transfer, collaboration and providing students and faculty with a supportive entrepreneurial environment. The purpose of this policy is to establish a framework for the operation of TIP.

APPLIES TO

University’s Technology Incubation Program at all campuses including UConn Health.

POLICY REQUIREMENTS

Standards and Procedures

The Office of the Vice President for Research (OVPR) is responsible for managing TIP. OVPR will develop standards and procedures for the program and be responsible for coordinating, administrating and monitoring TIP in order to promote the effective implementation of this policy. OVPR’s standards and procedures must be consistent with University policies and include the following:

  1. A requirement that companies interested in participating in TIP must apply for admittance.
  2. An application process that includes a review of information provided by the company that is sufficient to determine (1) that a relationship with the company is beneficial to the goals of the University and (2) that the company has a plan in place for the company’s operation at the University with milestones to assure the accomplishment of mutually beneficial goals.
  3. A requirement that a written assessment supporting a company’s admission be completed and maintained by OVPR. Each written assessment should include a copy of the company’s application and any other relevant materials provided by the company during the application process.
  4. A requirement that admitted companies must maintain a physical presence on a University campus and enter into a written agreement to use University space. Written agreements may be in the form of a lease or license.
  5. Establishment of standard rates for the leasing and licensing of TIP space. Premium rates may be charged to selected companies with the capacity to pay market rents. Discounted rates may be charged to UConn student run companies.
  6. Provisions requiring each admitted company to comply with all University, State and Federal rules and regulations including those for Environmental Health and Safety (EHS) and, where appropriate, rules related to animal care, use of human subjects, embryonic stem cells, other biomaterials, etc.
  7. Documentation of insurance and other appropriate terms to assure that the University and the State are adequately protected from possible liability.
  8. A restriction limiting a company’s participation in TIP to no more than five years unless scientific and commercial progress is demonstrated by a company along with a need to continue participating in TIP due to special circumstances.
  9. Regular updates on each company’s progress and annual reviews against its milestones.

TIP Services 

OVPR will offer admitted companies access to wet and dry laboratory and office space. OVPR may also offer the following support services:

  1. Business counseling;
  2. Marketing support;
  3. Access to mentors and advisors;
  4. Access to the University IT system, select library and electronic collections;
  5. Participation in events of interest to early stage firms;
  6. Environmental Health and Safety training;
  7. Access to specialized facilities, equipment and instrumentation by special arrangement;
  8. Parking privileges on the same terms as University employees.

TIP Space

Only areas designated as TIP space by the University may be utilized for TIP purposes.   TIP space is currently made available at the Farmington, Storrs and Avery Point campuses.

Tenants will be responsible for space renovation costs and must receive appropriate University approvals prior to any work commencing.

TIP Leasing Process

Companies that want to occupy University space must execute a lease or a license agreement. TIP leases require Board of Trustees approval except as specified below.

A TIP lease can be approved without Board of Trustee approval if it meets the following criteria:

  1. The space being leased has been designated for TIP use;
  1. The rent per square foot and the other financial terms of the lease are consistent with the standard terms for TIP as approved by the Vice President for Research;
  1. The lease is for a term (initial term plus all extensions provide for in the lease that may be exercised by either party) that does not exceed five years;
  1. The lease is terminable at the option of the University and the required termination notice period is sixty (60) days or less;
  1. The lease has been reviewed by University counsel and approved by the Office of the Attorney General and State Treasurer.

Leases meeting the above criteria may be approved and signed by the President without coming to the Board. The President may re-delegate this authority to a Vice President.

ENFORCEMENT

Violations of this policy may result in appropriate disciplinary measures in accordance with University By-Laws, General Rules of Conduct for All University Employees, applicable collective bargaining agreements, and the University of Connecticut Student Code.

POLICY HISTORY

Policy created: March 13, 2008*

Policy Revised: December 7, 2016*

* Approved by the Board of Trustees.

Supersedes:      

Board of Trustee’s Policy on Incubation Company Leasing (January 22, 2008).

Board of Trustee’s June 28, 2012 Resolution titled: Delegation of Authority to Approve Leases for the Technology Incubation Program (TIP) in Specified Circumstance.

Human Subjects Research

Title: Human Subjects Research
Policy Owner: Office of the Vice President for Research
Applies to: Employees, Faculty, Students, Others
Campus Applicability: All Campuses
Effective Date: May 25, 2018
For More Information, Contact Office of the Vice President for Research
Contact Information: (860) 486-3001
Official Website: http://research.uconn.edu/

REASON FOR POLICY

The University of Connecticut is committed to ensuring the safety, rights and welfare of all participants involved in human subjects research conducted at or by the University of Connecticut on all its campuses, including UConn Health (the “University”). This policy establishes that whenever the University engages in human research it will be guided by the ethical principles of the Belmont Report and will comply with applicable legal requirements. It is the responsibility of all components of the human research protection program to work collaboratively to ensure research with human subjects is conducted in accordance with such ethical principles and legal requirements.

APPLIES TO

All University faculty, employees, students, postdoctoral fellows, residents and other trainees, and agents who supervise or conduct human subject research.  Such research includes, but is not limited to, obtaining data through intervention or interaction with individuals, using identifiable private information or identifiable biospecimens from living individuals and using human tissue to evaluate the safety or effectiveness of an investigational device.

DEFINITIONS

Human Research Protection Program (“HRPP”):  The University’s comprehensive system designed to ensure that the University meets ethical principles and legal requirements for the protection of the safety, rights and welfare of human participants in research.  The HRPP encompasses all University-associated individuals and units responsible for the conduct and oversight of research involving human participants.

Human Subject or Human Participant:

  • A living individual about whom an investigator (whether professional or student) conducting research obtains data through intervention or interaction with the individual, or identifiable private information. [45 CFR 102(f)]
  • An individual who is or becomes a participant in research, either as a recipient of the test article or as a control. Such subject may be either a healthy individual or a patient. For research that evaluates the safety or effectiveness of a device, the definition also includes a human on whose specimen an investigational device is used. Such subject may be in normal health or may have a medical condition or disease. [21 CFR 56.102(e); 21 CFR 812.3(p)]
  • Any other individual meeting the legal requirements of a human subject or human participant in research.

Institutional Official (“IO”): The individual appointed by the President of the University who is legally authorized to act for and on behalf of the University in matters related to human subject research and the protection of human research participants. The IO oversees the HRPP and is responsible for ensuring that it functions effectively and that the University provides appropriate resources and support to comply with applicable legal requirements governing human subject research.

Institutional Review Board (“IRB”): A multidisciplinary group whose membership meets applicable legal requirements, which reviews, approves, and oversees all University research involving human subjects. An integral component of the HRPP, the IRB review ensures the protection of the safety, rights and welfare of human subjects and that applicable legal requirements are met.

Research:

  • A systematic investigation, including research development, testing and evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge. [45 CFR 102(d)]
  • A clinical investigation, meaning any experiment that involves a test article and one or more human subjects, and that either must meet the requirements for prior submission to the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) under section 505(i) or 520(g) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as amended (the “Act”), or need not meet the requirements for prior submission to the FDA under these sections of the Act, but the results of which are intended to be later submitted to, or held for inspection by, the FDA as part of an application for a research or marketing permit. [21 CFR 102(c)]
  • Any other activities meeting the legal requirements of research involving human subjects or human participants.

POLICY STATEMENT

The University will designate one or more IRBs for the review of research involving human participants.

The IO is delegated the authority to develop policies and procedures, and to implement a program to ensure the safety, rights and welfare of human participants in research that is legally compliant.

All human subjects research, regardless of sponsorship or funding, must be reviewed and approved by a University designated IRB before research begins unless specifically exempted from review by policy or procedure.

Designated IRBs are granted the authority to:

  • Approve, require modifications to secure approval, or disapprove research involving human subjects;
  • Suspend or terminate approval of research not being conducted in accordance with the IRB’s requirements or that has been associated with unexpected serious harm to human subjects;
  • Take actions determined necessary to ensure legal compliance and adherence to University policy, and to mitigate issues associated with unanticipated problems or risks to human participants and others;
  • Observe, or have a third party observe, the consent process or conduct of the research; and
  • Conduct continuing review of research annually or at intervals appropriate to the degree of risk.

University personnel may not approve research involving human participants if it has not been approved by a University designated IRB.  Research that has been approved by a designated IRB may be subject to further review and approval or disapproval.

Research Subject to the Common Rule. Human subject research that is conducted or supported by any federal department or agency that has adopted the Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects, known as the Common Rule, will comply with the requirements set forth in the Health & Human Services Regulations at 45 CFR part 46 (including subparts A, B, C and D), unless the research is otherwise exempt from these requirements.  Relevant HRPP and IRB policies and other applicable legal requirements of the department or agency conducting or supporting the research may also apply.

Research Subject to FDA Regulation. Clinical investigations regulated by the FDA under section 505(i) or 520(g) of the Act (21 U. S.C. § 355(i)) will comply with the applicable FDA regulations. These regulations include, but are not limited to: Protection of Human Subjects (21 CFR part 50), Institutional Review Boards (21 CFR part 56), Investigational New Drug Application (21 CFR part 312), Applications for FDA Approval to Market a New Drug (21 CFR part 314) and Investigational Device Exemptions (21 CFR part 812).  Relevant HRPP and IRB policies may also apply.

Other Research. For all other research involving human participants, the University applies the policies of the HRPP, which are guided in their development and implementation by the Health & Human Services Regulations at 45 CFR part 46 (including four subparts) and the International Conference on Harmonization Good Clinical Practice Consolidated Guidelines.

ENFORCEMENT

Violations of this policy may result in appropriate disciplinary measures in accordance with University By-Laws, General Rules of Conduct for All University Employees, applicable collective bargaining agreements, the University of Connecticut Student Code, and other applicable University Policies.

ADDITIONAL RESOURCES

45 CFR part 46 (including subparts A, B, C and D)

21 CFR part 50

21 CFR part 56

21 CFR part 312

21 CFR part 314

21 CFR part 812

ICH GCP (E6)

Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research (1979)

POLICY HISTORY

Revisions: 2/16/2011; 5/25/2018 (Approved by President’s Cabinet)

Financial Conflicts of Interest in Research

Title: Financial Conflicts of Interest in Research
Policy Owner: Vice President for Research
Applies to: Faculty, Staff, Students
Campus Applicability: Storrs and Regional Campuses
Approval Date: January 30, 2023
Effective Date: January 30, 2023
For More Information, Contact Director, Sponsored Program Services
Contact Information: (860) 486-3622
Official Website: https://ovpr.uconn.edu/services/rics/fcoi/

 

BACKGROUND

Investigators at the University of Connecticut (University) promote the research mission of the University relating to the discovery and dissemination of knowledge that emerges from that research. Participation in activities of professional associations, industry collaborations, and other public and private entities can assist in meeting these expectations, while also serving the academic interests of the University. In addition, such participation brings enhanced national and international status to the University and the State. Over the past decade, the opportunity for University faculty and staff to engage in external professional and entrepreneurial activities has increased markedly, and is encouraged by the state and federal governments because of the resulting economic development benefits. The State of Connecticut has determined that the commercialization of University research and technology transfer is critical to Connecticut’s long-term economic growth.

However, it is vital that Investigators adhere to state and federal regulations dealing with avoiding and managing potential and existing conflicts of interest. In order for the University to maintain public   trust and support in carrying out its mission, including all sponsored activities, the University must demonstrate that it subjects itself to the highest standards of ethical behavior.

 

PURPOSE

This Policy on Financial Conflicts of Interest in Research (Policy) provides guidelines to promote objectivity in research. The Policy establishes standards to ensure that the design, conduct, and reporting of research funded by extramural sponsors will not be biased by any conflicting financial interest of an Investigator. The University encourages Investigators to engage in appropriate outside relationships, but significant financial interests related to these relationships need to be disclosed, reviewed, and managed in accordance with this Policy.

 

APPLICABLE FEDERAL REGULATIONS

The following federal regulations inform this policy:

Department of Energy (DOE) Interim Conflict of Interest Policy
https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2022-10/Department%20of%20Energy%20Interim%20Conflict%20of%20Interest%20Policy.pdf

Public Health Service (PHS)
https://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/coi/index.htm

National Science Foundation (NSF)
http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappguide/nsf10_1/aag_4.jsp

Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
https://www.fda.gov/RegulatoryInformation/

In summary, the federal policies and regulations stipulate:

  1. Disclosures of significant financial interests by ALL Investigators;
  2. Institutional certification that all proposed and ongoing sponsored research is either free of financial conflicts of interest, or that such conflicts are managed, reduced or eliminated, and reported as required by applicable regulations;
  3. The implementation of an institutional mechanism for managing financial conflicts of interest in research;
  4. Notification of sponsors, as required, of management plans and if the University is unable to manage financial conflicts of interest satisfactorily;
  5. Monitoring of compliance, procedures for retroactive review in cases of non-compliance, enforcement mechanisms, and sanctions where appropriate;
  6. Maintenance of records relating to this policy for at least three years following the termination of a given project; and,
  7. Providing information and training to Investigators, as required by applicable regulations.

 

DEFINITIONS

Business: any corporation, partnership, sole proprietorship, firm, franchise, association, organization, holding company, joint stock company, receivership, business or real estate trust, or any other legal entity organized for profit or charitable purposes.

Clinical Investigation(PHS): any experiment in which a drug is administered or dispensed to, or used, involving one or more human subjects. An experiment here is any use of a drug, except for the use of a marketed drug in the course of medical practice.

Clinical Investigation (FDA): any experiment that involves a test article and one or more human subjects, and that either is subject to requirements for prior submission to the Food and Drug Administration under section 505(i) or 520(g) of the act, or is not subject to requirements for prior submission to the Food and Drug Administration under these sections of the act, but the results of which are intended to be submitted later to, or held for inspection by, the Food and Drug Administration as part of an application for a research or marketing permit. The term does not include experiments that are subject to the provisions of part 58 of the chapter, regarding non-clinical laboratory studies.

Financial Conflict of Interest (FCOI):  a situation in which significant financial interests in a business, or other personal considerations provided by a business, may compromise, or have the appearance of compromising, an Investigator’s professional judgment in conducting or reporting research, the results of which could affect the aforementioned business, either directly or indirectly. An FCOI exists when the University, through its designated official(s), reasonably determines that an Investigator’s Significant Financial Interest is related to a research project and could directly and significantly affect the design, conduct or reporting of the research.

Human Subject (PHS regulations “Protection of Human Subjects” 45 CFR Part 46, as administered by OHRP): a living individual about whom an Investigator conducting research obtains data  through intervention or interaction with the individual, or identifiable private information.

Human Subject (FDA regulations 21 CFR 50): an individual who is, or becomes, a participant in research, either as a recipient of the test article or as a control. A subject may be either a healthy human or a patient.

Immediate Family: the Investigator’s spouse/domestic partner and dependent children.

Institutional Responsibilities: an Investigator’s professional responsibilities on behalf of the University, which include research, teaching, and service as, e.g., outlined in the Policy on Faculty Professional Responsibilities (http://policy.uconn.edu/?p=659).

Intellectual Property: a product of the intellect that has commercial value, including copyrighted works, patents, business methods, and industrial processes.

Investigator: the principal investigator and any other person (regardless of title or position) who is responsible for the design, conduct or reporting of research or educational activities*. This may include faculty and research staff (research associates and assistants, postdoctoral fellows, graduate students, visiting scientists engaged in research conducted at the University) as well as consultants.

*For DOE funded projects, the definition states that the Principal Investigator or any other person, regardless of title or position, who is responsible for the purpose, design, conduct, or reporting of a project.

Research (PHS regulation 45 CFR 46.102(d)): a systematic investigation, including research development, testing and evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge. Activities which meet this definition constitute research for purposes of this Policy, whether or not they are conducted or supported under a program which is considered research for other purposes.

Significant Financial Interest (SFI):

  1. Significant Financial Interest means:
For DOE, PHS and all sponsors that follow the 2011 PHS FCOI Regulations[1] For NSF and all other sponsors:

 

With regard to any publicly traded entity, an SFI exists if the value of any remuneration[2] received from the entity in the twelve months preceding the disclosure and the value of any equity interest in the entity as of the date of disclosure, when aggregated, exceeds $5,000; or

 

With regard to any non-publicly traded entity, an SFI exists if the value of any remuneration received from the entity in the twelve months preceding the disclosure, when aggregated, exceeds $5,000, or  when  the  Investigator  (or the Investigator’s Immediate Family) holds any equity interest(e.g., stock, stock  option,  or other ownership interest); or

 

Intellectual property rights and interests (e.g., patents, copyrights), upon receipt of income related to such rights and interests.

 

An equity interest that when aggregated for the Investigator and the Investigator’s Immediate Family exceeded $5,000 over the last 12 months, and/or is expected to exceed $5,000 in value over the next 12 months as determined through reference to public prices or other reasonable measures of fair market value; or when the Investigator (or the Investigator’s Immediate Family) holds a 5% or greater equity interest (e.g., partnership, ownership, stock, stock option, or other ownership interest) in a single publicly traded entity or holds any equity interest in a non-publicly traded entity; or

 

Salary, royalties or other payments not from the University for services (e.g., consulting fees or honoraria) that when aggregated for the Investigator and the Immediate Family over the last 12 months exceeded $5,000 or are expected to exceed $5,000 over the next 12 months;

 

Investigators also must disclose the occurrence of any reimbursed or sponsored travel (i.e., that which is paid on behalf of the Investigator and not reimbursed to the Investigator so that the exact monetary value may not be readily available), related to their Institutional Responsibilities.

 

  1. In addition, the following needs to be disclosed for Clinical Investigations covered by FDA regulations:
    1. Compensation made to the Investigator in which the value of compensation could be affected by the outcome of the study/research project.
    2. A proprietary interest in the tested product, including, but not limited to, a patent, trademark, copyright or licensing agreement.
    3. Significant payments of other sorts, which are payments that have a cumulative monetary value of $25,000 or more made by the sponsor of a covered study to the investigator or the investigators’ institution to support activities of the investigator exclusive of the costs of conducting the clinical study or other clinical studies, (e.g., a grant to fund ongoing research, compensation in the form of equipment or retainers for ongoing consultation or honoraria) during the time the clinical investigator is carrying out the study and for one year following completion of the study.
  2. Department of Energy
    1. For each disclosure investigators will comply with the DOE specific certification statement requirements.
  1. The term Significant Financial Interest does not include the following types of financial interests:
      1. Salary, royalties, or other remuneration paid by the Institution to the Investigator if the Investigator is currently employed or otherwise appointed by the University, including intellectual property rights assigned to the University and agreements to share in royalties related to such rights;
      2. Income from investment vehicles, such as mutual funds and retirement accounts, as long as the Investigator does not directly control the investment decisions made in these vehicles;
      3. Income from seminars, lectures, or teaching engagements sponsored by a  federal,  state,  or local government agency, an institution of higher education as defined at 20 U.S.C. 1001(a), an academic teaching hospital, a medical center, or a research institute that is affiliated with an Institution of higher education;**; or
      4. Income from service on advisory committees or review panels for a federal, state, or local government agency, an Institution of higher education as defined at 20 U.S.C. 1001(a), an academic teaching hospital, a medical center, or a research institute that is affiliated with an institution of higher education.**
      5. Travel that is reimbursed or sponsored by a federal, state, or local government agency, an Institution of higher education as defined at 20 U.S.C. 1001(a), an academic teaching hospital, a medical center,** or a research institute that is affiliated with an Institution of higher education.

    ** Department of Energy policy does not exclude academic teaching hospitals or medical centers for letters c, d and e above.

Sponsor: an individual company, or any entity which takes responsibility for the initiation, management, and/or financing of a research project, but which does not actually conduct the investigation.

 

PROCEDURES

I. Notification

A copy of this policy will be sent to all current Investigators and will be provided to all new Investigators upon hire. The policy is also available on the UConn website under “University Policies.”

 

II. Training

All PHS-funded and DOE- funded Investigators must complete training prior to engaging in PHS or DOE funded research and at least every four years thereafter as well as under the following circumstances (in the timeframes noted in parentheses):

  1. The University’s Financial Conflict of Interest policy changes such that Investigator requirements are affected (within 60 days).
  2. An Investigator is new to the University (prior to engaging in PHS or DOE funded research).
  3. The University finds that an Investigator is not in compliance with the Policy or a management plan, as applicable.

 

III. Disclosure of Significant Financial Interests

Each Investigator must disclose his/her known SFIs (including those of the Investigator’s Immediate Family) that reasonably appear to be related to the Investigator’s Institutional Responsibilities, or that would reasonably appear to be affected by the research for which funding is sought or are in entities whose financial interests would reasonably be affected by the research. In determining whether a financial interest has to be disclosed, the Investigator shall consult the definition of SFI within this policy and, if in doubt, resolve in favor of disclosure.

  1. Disclosure for each Proposal Submission: At the time of submission of a new proposal, an Investigator must have completed their online financial disclosure in the I nfoEd External Interests Module. The University will not submit a proposal until such disclosure has been submitted.
  2. Changes in SFI: An updated disclosure shall be completed and filed within thirty (30) days at any time when an Investigator acquires or discovers a new reportable SFI not disclosed in the last disclosure. For existing Investigators on a project, new or newly identified SFIs will be reviewed promptly to determine if an FCOI exists, create a management plan if necessary and report the newly identified FCOI to the sponsor within 60 days if required.
  3. Human Subject Research: When research involves human subjects, the Investigator must disclose SFIs to the Institutional Review Board (IRB) with every submission of protocols. If an Investigator has an FCOI, but a management plan is not on file, the IRB will contact the VPR or their designee and hold approval of the protocol until the FCOIR makes a determination.
  4. New Investigators: If research is ongoing and an Investigator newly participating in the project discloses an SFI related to that research, those SFIs will be reviewed promptly to determine if an FCOI exists, create a management plan if necessary and report the newly identified FCOI to the sponsor within 60 days if required.

 

IV. Determination, Resolution, and Management of a Conflict of Interest

  1. The VPR will review SFI Disclosure Forms and, if an SFI is disclosed, the Investigator will be required to complete a Supplemental Information Request to Significant Financial Interest Disclosure. The VPR or his/her delegate performs an initial administrative review and refers all disclosed SFIs to the Financial Conflict of Interest in Research Committee.
  2. The Financial Conflict of Interest in Research Committee (FCOIR) is appointed by the VPR and serves as the resource with respect to the determination of relatedness of SFIs and the identification and management of COIs. The FCOIRC shall include an appointed chair and (5) additional appointed members with broad representation across the University, and may include one community member who is not a University employee.
  3. The FCOIRC, with the help of the Investigator and/or his/her department head and based on guidelines consistent with all applicable regulations, will determine if the SFI is related to a sponsored research project and, if so related, whether the SFI constitutes a financial conflict of interest (FCOI).
  4. If the FCOIRC identifies an FCOI, it will resolve the conflict by elimination, mitigation, or the creation of a management plan. The Investigator has to agree in writing to the conditions listed in such management plan. The following are examples of conditions that may be imposed:

Public disclosure of SFIs, including disclosure on manuscripts submitted for publication, on abstracts and posters submitted for presentation, and on informed consent documents;

    1. Monitoring of the research by independent reviewers;
    2. Modification of the research;
    3. Disqualification from participation in all or a portion of the activities that could be affected by the FCOI;
    4. Divestiture or reduction of the SFI;
    5. Severance of relationships that create actual or potential conflicts.
  1. An FCOI must be eliminated or a management plan agreed to before a related award will be set up. Neither the institution nor an Investigator may expend funds unless it has been determined that no FCOI exists or that the FCOI is manageable in accordance with the terms of a management plan.

 

V. Notification/Reporting

If an FCOI is identified, the FCOIRC is responsible for:

  1. Notification of the Investigator of the management plan designed by the Committee for his/her FCOI;
  2. Notification of the Office for Sponsored Programs (OSP) to assure that no spending of funds from related grants occurs without prior approval of the FCOIRC.
  3. Notification of the Office of Research Compliance of FCOI management plan when the research involves human subjects.
  4. Notification of research sponsors, as required, of any FCOIs, including any measures taken to reduce, manage, or eliminate such conflicts. The elements of such a report shall include, at least, the items enumerated under the FCOI Regulations.

The VPR or his/her delegate will notify the above individuals, offices, and sponsors on behalf of the FCOIRC. Reasonable efforts will be made to maintain the privacy of information gathered in the FCOIRC’s deliberations, within the limits imposed by applicable laws and regulations.

 

VI. Maintenance of Records

All records related to the implementation of this policy (e.g., Individual Financial Disclosure Forms, Supplemental Information Forms, minutes of the meetings of the COI in Research Management Committee, notifications to funding agencies, actions taken to resolve or mitigate FCOIs, etc.) will be maintained securely by the VPR for a period of at least three (3) years beyond the termination or completion of the sponsored award to which they relate, or until the resolution of any action involving those records, whichever is longer.  FCOI records shall be subject to periodic review for compliance  with this policy by the VPR or by any agency per applicable regulations.

 

VII. Subrecipients

If a subrecipient carries out a portion of the work, University shall take reasonable steps to ensure that any subrecipient and subrecipient Investigator complies with the applicable FCOI regulation.

University will establish, via a written agreement, the governing FCOI policy.

  1. Sub-recipient will certify that its FCOI policy complies with the respective regulations and, further, sub-recipient will report identified FCOIs for its investigators in a time frame that allows University to report identified FCOIs to the awarding agency.
  2. Alternatively, if a sub-recipient lacks a compliant FCOI policy, the subrecipient will be governed by the University’s FCOI policy; University will solicit and review sub-recipient Investigator disclosures and identify, manage and report FCOIs to the sponsor.

In the event that a sub-recipient notifies University of an FCOI for sub-recipient Investigators for which University is the prime awardee, University will promptly notify the sponsor.

 

VIII. Public Accessibility

Prior to expending any funds under a PHS-funded grant, cooperative agreement or contract, the VPR shall ensure public accessibility of information about the FCOI, via a written response to any   requestor within five (5) business days of a request, of information concerning an SFI which was disclosed and is still held by the senior/key personnel on the project, which is determined to be  related to the PHS-funded research, and which is determined to be a FCOI. The information shall consist of the information required to be provided under the FCOI Regulations.

 

IX. Monitoring Compliance/Mitigation

  1. The VPR will monitor for compliance with the policy.
  2. If the VPR learns of an SFI that was not timely disclosed or was not timely reviewed, the VPR, or his/her delegate, shall, in consultation with the FCOIRC and no later than the sixtieth (60th) day after learning of the SFI:
    1. determine whether the SFI is an FCOI; and
    2. if an FCOI exists, implement an interim management plan or implement other interim measures to ensure the objectivity of the research going forward.
  1. If an FCOI was not timely identified or managed or if an Investigator fails to comply with a management plan, the VPR shall no later than the 120th day after determining noncompliance:
    1. complete and document a retrospective review and determination as to whether research conducted during the period of noncompliance was biased in the design, conduct, or reporting of the research; and
    2. implement any measures necessary with regard to Investigator’s participation in the research between the date that the noncompliance is identified and the date the retrospective review is completed.
  1. For PHS and DOE-covered research projects, the retrospective review shall cover key elements as specified by federal regulations and may result in updating the Financial Conflict of Interest Report, notifying the PHS or DOE awarding component, and submitting a mitigation report as required by federal regulation.
  2. University will notify the PHS and DOE of instances in which the failure of an Investigator to comply with this policy or a management plan appears to have biased the design, conduct, or reporting (and purpose for DOE funded research) of funded research. The University will make information available to HHS, PHS and DOE awarding component as required by federal regulation.

 

X. Appeals

  1. In situations where an Investigator disputes the decision of the FCOIRC, the Investigator may request to present the case to the FCOIRC in person. An Investigator  who  disagrees  with  the FCOIRC’s determination may appeal in writing to the VPR. An appeal may be made in regard to  whether the professional judgment of the Investigator is likely to affect his or her conduct of research, but Investigators may not contest the terms and conditions of this.
  2. The VPR may agree with the FCOIRC’s findings and/or recommendations, or may amend such findings and/or recommendations. The VPR shall promptly notify the Investigator and the FCOIRC in writing of the conclusions of his/her review, including the actions that must be taken by the Investigator to comply with this policy.
  3. Upon receipt of the VPR’s written report, the Investigator must promptly comply with the actions specified in that report.

 

XI. Implementation and Enforcement

The Provost is the senior administrator responsible for overseeing the implementation of this Policy. The Provost has delegated the disclosure/review/management process to the Vice President for Research or his/her designee (VPR). The VPR, in consultation with the Dean of the appropriate School and the Investigator(s) Department Head, will review all breaches of the policy, including:

  1. failure to comply with the process (by refusal to respond, by responding with incomplete or knowingly inaccurate information, or otherwise);
  2. failure to remedy conflicts; and
  3. failure to comply with a prescribed management plan

Sanctions and penalties for those who knowingly and willfully disregard this policy, or refuse to   comply with its terms, will be determined by the VPR, in consultation with the Dean of the appropriate School, with advice from the Investigator(s) Department Head and the Department  of Faculty and  Staff Labor Relations . Sanctions include, but are not restricted to:

  • Letter of reprimand
  • Notification to professional and/or scientific societies, funding agencies and/or professional journals
  • Reassignment of duties Termination of grant support
  • Adjustment of research space allocation Adjustment of salary
  • Suspension
  • Dismissal

 

XII. Audit Procedures

In order to ensure that all declarations are being made and financial conflicts managed, the University will implement a relevant audit program through the University’s Office of Audit and Management Advisory Services.

 

REFERENCES

[1] E.g. American Heart Association and American Cancer Society

[2] For purposes of this definition, remuneration includes salary and any payment for services not

otherwise identified as salary (e.g., consulting fees, honoraria, paid authorship); equity interest includes any stock, stock option, or other ownership interest, as determined through reference to public prices or other reasonable measures of fair market value

 

POLICY HISTORY

Policy created: 01/23/2015

Revisions:          01/30/2023 (Approved by Senior Policy Council and the President)

                               

Health and Safety Policy

Title: Health and Safety Policy
Policy Owner: Department of Environmental Health and Safety
Applies to: Faculty, Staff, Students, Others
Campus Applicability: UConn Storrs, Regionals, and the Law School
Effective Date: April 27, 2023
For More Information, Contact Department of Environmental Health and Safety
Contact Information: (860) 486-3613 or ehs@uconn.edu
Official Website: http://www.ehs.uconn.edu/

 

PURPOSE

The University of Connecticut is committed to providing a safe and healthful environment for all activities under the jurisdiction of the University.  Accordingly, the University has developed this top level over-arching health and safety policy to outline responsibilities and establish the framework of compliance with all applicable Federal, State and local regulations and University policies and procedures pertaining to worker safety and public health.* Compliance with this policy along with subordinate health and safety policies, programs and procedures linked at the end of this policy document is mandatory.

 

APPLIES TO

This policy applies to all faculty, staff, students, researchers, and all other individuals working at the University of Connecticut Storrs, regional campuses and the Law School.

 

POLICY STATEMENT

The health and safety of all faculty, staff, students and visitors shall be a principal consideration in the planning and conduct of all University activities and programs, and in the design, construction, modification, or renovation of all University buildings and facilities.

 

This broad policy requires that health and safety regulations of Federal, State and local authorities, appropriate consensus standards of recognized organizations, and University specific policies are met.

 

ENFORCEMENT

Violations of this policy including, subordinate health and safety policies, programs or procedures may result in disciplinary measures in accordance with University Laws and By-Laws, General Rules of Conduct for All University Employees, applicable collective bargaining agreements, and the University of Connecticut Student Code.

 

PROCEDURES/FORMS

Building and Emergency Contact (BEC) list
Employee Safety Training Assessment (ESTA)
Workplace Hazard Assessment (WHA)

 

RESPONSIBILITIES

Individuals – Safety is the responsibility of each and every person at the University of Connecticut. All members of the University community are individually and collectively the owners of safety and share the responsibility to provide and maintain a safe environment.  Each individual is expected to comply with health and safety regulations and University policies, programs and procedures; perform work in a safe and sensible manner and to act to ensure the health and safety of self, coworkers, fellow students and all others at the University.

Individuals working for the University (employees) are required within five days of employment, transfer or job change to discuss potential hazards that they may encounter during the course of their employment with their supervisor.  That discussion shall include identification of workplace hazards along with required controls, personal protective equipment (PPE) and requisite safety training.  Completion and submission of an employee specific Employee Safety Training Assessment defines required safety training.  Individuals are responsible to comply with defined controls, wear the appropriate PPE and attend requisite safety training in a timely manner.

Principal Investigators/Unit Managers – All personnel who assign and/or oversee work are responsible to ensure that compliant work controls and procedures consistent with Federal, State and local regulations and University policies are implemented to provide for the protection of all personnel and to safeguard the environment.   PIs/Unit Managers in consultation with EHS shall respond in a timely manner to address safety complaints, non-compliances and mitigate potentially unsafe conditions.  PIs/Unit Managers should set, by example, high standards for health and safety. These standards must be consistently applied and appropriate action taken when personnel fail to meet them.

PIs/Unit Managers (supervisors) are responsible to identify hazards in the work environment along with required controls and PPE using the Workplace Hazard Assessment (WHA) form. The WHA must be kept current and reviewed regularly.

The WHA and the ESTA are generic tools that must be used by the PI/Unit Manager (or designee) to document review of hazards in the workplace along with appropriate controls, PPE and safety training.  The ESTA must be completed with the employee within five days of their arrival, transfer or job change.  Failure to complete an ESTA or to ensure that employees attend the required training may result in disciplinary action.

Deans, Directors, and Department Heads – Each Dean, Director, and Department Head is charged to ensure organizational compliance with regulations and University policies and with maintaining a healthful and safe environment for all personnel.  They are expected to take appropriate action to ensure all identified hazards are addressed and identified issues of non-compliance corrected in a timely manner.

Updates are requested from each Dean, Department Head and Director to the Building and Emergency Contact Listing (BEC List) to ensure the timely and effective communication of information to assigned contacts within each building, regarding emergencies, incidents, projects, and other activities that may impact the health and safety of building occupants.

 

The Department of Environmental Health and Safety (EHS) – EHS is charged by the University with implementing all University health and safety policies and procedures* in the Biological, Chemical, Occupational, Public Health, Environmental, and Radiation health and safety fields. EHS has been authorized by, and is accountable to, the University President and Senior University Management to identify, assess and enforce this Health and Safety policy and subordinate health and safety regulations, policies, and procedures.

EHS is responsible for maintaining a comprehensive program that combines training, consultation, control, and inspection to protect the health and safety of all personnel in the course of University sanctioned activities.  EHS staff provides professional services to measure and evaluate hazards to which the University community may be exposed and ensure compliance with regulations and University policies.  EHS’s responsibilities include:

  • Ensure that all written policies, procedures, and training materials for applicable health and safety regulatory standards are established, current, and available for delivery to appropriate campus groups;
  • Maintain an up-to-date webpage to enhance access to health and safety policies, procedures, technical guidance documents, and compliance assistance information;
  • Facilitate health and safety communications with the University community, and stress the importance of campus wide adherence to appropriate regulations, standards, and policies;
  • Provide graded approach (risk based) inspection services to enhance campus health and safety; and facilitate timely correction of identified non-compliances through escalating notification and enforcement;
  • Verify completion, adequacy, and adherence to required health and safety tools (e.g., WHA, ESTAs);
  • Promote EHS’s role as an environmental health and safety information resource ready to meet the needs of the campus community; and
  • Take appropriate measures (including Stop Work Authority for imminent hazard situations) to maintain acceptable margins of safety and regulatory compliance over all University operations.

* Matters pertaining to public safety, fire safety, and building code compliance, are addressed by other units within the Division of University Safety.

 

Administrative Oversight – The Associate Vice President of University Safety and the Director of EHS review and approve health and safety policies for the University on behalf of the President and Board of Trustees.  The Associate Vice President of University Safety is the responsible Senior University Manager for EHS and oversees the implementation of these policies.

 

COMMITTEES

Environmental Health and Safety Committee

The Environmental Health and Safety Committee has a diverse membership appointed by the Associate Vice President of University Safety.  Members represent the administration, faculty, and staff along with collective bargaining units, and students. The Committee meets quarterly, as mandated by CT General Statute 31-40v, “Establishment of Safety and Health Committees by Certain Employers,” to fulfill its functions and responsibilities. The committee is charged with but not limited to establishing procedures for sharing ideas with the employer concerning:

  1. Safety inspections;
  2. Investigating safety incidents, accidents, illnesses, and deaths;
  3. Evaluating accident and illness prevention programs;
  4. Establishing training programs for the identification and reduction of hazards in the workplace which damage the reproductive system of employees; and
  5. Establishing training programs to assist committee members in understanding and identifying the effects of employee substance abuse on workplace accidents and safety.

 

Focused Subject Matter Safety Committees

A number of safety committees reporting to the Vice President of Research have been established that address aspects of health and safety specific to research activities or focused subject matter.   These committees serve as advisory boards and research protocol review boards working in partnership with EHS to fulfill University goals.  Committee and subject matter information is linked below.

Chemical Hygiene Committee
Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC)
Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC)
Institutional Review Board (IRB)
Laser Safety Committee
Radiation Safety Committee

 

 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH and SAFETY POLICIES, PROGRAMS AND PROCEDURES

The University Health and Safety Policy is implemented through a series of policies, programs, procedures and other documents, as appropriate to the operations of UConn. These documents have been developed by EHS in response to regulatory requirements and/or University committee decisions.  These items, listed below, are mandatory in nature, and must be followed to ensure compliance.  They can also be found on the EHS website at:   http://www.ehs.uconn.edu/ppp/

Analytical X-Ray Safety Program
Arboricultural Operations Procedures
Asbestos Management Plan
Biological Safety Manual
Bloodborne Pathogens Exposure Control Plan
Chemical Hygiene Plan
Chemical Waste Disposal Manual
Confined Spaced Program
Contractor EHS Manual
Controlled Substances Policy
Electrical Safety Program
Excavation and Trenching Procedures
Fall Protection Program
Food Service Policies
General Workplace Health & Safety Inspection Program
Hazard Communication Program
Hearing Conservation Program
Laboratory Chemical Inventory Program
Laboratory Inspection Program
Laser Safety Manual
Lockout/Tagout Program
Occupational Health and Safety Program for Animal Handlers
PCB Management Plan
Powered Industrial Truck Program
Radiation Safety Committee Policy on Minor Modifications to an Existing Protocol
Radiation Safety Manual
Respirator Program
Rooftop Laboratory Exhaust Systems Maintenance Procedure
Silica in Construction Exposure Plan
Silica in General Industry Exposure Control Plan
Space Heaters Policy
Transportation of Biological Materials
Working Alone Policy

 

POLICY HISTORY

Policy created: 10/14/2014 (Approved by Senior Policy Council)
Revisions: 03/10/2023 (Approved by Senior Policy Council 04/26/2023)