As part of the University’s ongoing commitment to maintaining clear, relevant, and streamlined policies, several University Policies have been revised, transitioned to department-level standards documents, or decommissioned.
Author: Quiles, Anida
Approval Authority for Financial Transactions, Policy on
| Title: | Approval Authority for Financial Transactions, Policy on |
|---|---|
| Policy Owner: | Office of the Executive Vice President for Finance and Chief Financial Officer |
| Applies to: | University Workforce Members |
| Campus Applicability: | All UConn Campuses, except UConn Health |
| Approval Date: | May 29, 2025 |
| Effective Date: | July 1, 2025 |
| For More Information, Contact: | University of Connecticut Controller’s Office |
| Contact Information: | 860-486-2937 |
| Official Website: | https://controller.uconn.edu |
PURPOSE
To ensure financial transactions are approved by individuals with the necessary knowledge and oversight authority. This policy outlines the criteria for granting approval authority and necessary internal controls and required documentation for the overall approval process.
Note: This policy does not address the authority to sign contracts on behalf of UConn which is covered by “UConn Delegation of Contract Approval and Signature Authority” and accompanying procedures.
APPLIES TO
This policy applies to any University Workforce Member who approves UConn financial transactions, including independent contractors, affiliates, and UConn Health employees with access to UConn’s financial systems.
DEFINITIONS
Authorized Approver: A person authorized to approve financial transactions at the University due to their expertise, oversight, and understanding of the transaction’s nature and implications.
Authorized Delegate: A person authorized to approve a financial transaction on behalf of the Authorized Approver. NOTE: For payroll/timesheet transactions and travel expense approvals, the Authorized Delegate must be of equal rank or higher than the Authorized Approver.
Financial Transaction: Any transaction processed within UConn’s financial systems with a financial implication to the University.
Financial Systems: All electronic systems used by the University to process financial transactions including, but not limited to:
- Core-CT – Time and labor system
- Concur Travel System (Concur)
- Kuali Financial System (KFS) – Financial enterprise resource system
- HuskyBuy – Purchasing system
- HuskyTime – Student time tracking system
- Public Safety Payroll (PSP) – NP-5 Bargaining Unit employee time tracking system
- PeopleSoft Student Administration System (Student Administration) – Student admissions, financials, financial aid, and records
- UKG – Dining Services student time tracking system
POLICY STATEMENT
The authority to receive or spend University funds is granted only to necessary individuals with direct knowledge of relevant Financial Transactions. Authorized Approvers and Authorized Delegates are expected to act responsibly, exercise sound judgment, and thoroughly review transactions in accordance with the internal controls outlined below before approving them.
Individuals Eligible for Approval Authority
Individuals must meet the following minimum criteria to be eligible for approval authority:
- Current, active UConn or UConn Health employee, independent contractor or affiliate (NOTE: Independent contractors and affiliates are not eligible to approve payroll or timesheet transactions);
- Competent and skilled in respective area(s) of responsibility; full understanding of the transactions needing approval;
- Adequately trained in the financial systems used for approval.
Granting, Changing, or Terminating Approval Authority
Authorized Approvers must be designated by their Department Head or equivalent senior manager. Authorized Approvers may identify an Authorized Delegate within their department with approval from their Department Head or equivalent. The Department Head is responsible for defining the types of financial transactions the Authorized Approver or Authorized Delegate can approve and setting any approval limits, such as dollar amounts, specific expenditures, or certain vendors. They must also ensure the Authorized Approver’s authority is commensurate with their experience, knowledge, skills, and position at the University. Although the Authorized Approver can delegate authority to others (with prior approvals from the Department Head or equivalent senior manager), they remain accountable for the approval of each financial transaction.
Any changes to the scope of transactions approved by an Authorized Approver or Authorized Delegate must be communicated in writing by the Department Head or equivalent to the IT or system administrator of the applicable financial system.
Approval authority can be revoked by the Department Head, Senior Management, Human Resources, Information Technology Services, or the University Controller at any time and must be no later than the employee’s last day in their current position.
If an Authorized Approver no longer serves in the position for which their authority was delegated, their approval authority terminates effective immediately.
Internal Controls and Segregation of Duties
The following principles must be upheld through implemented controls and systems:
- Authorized Approvers cannot approve transactions they created, payments to themselves, or any transaction that impacts them financially.
- Authorized Approvers must approve transactions within a timely manner and within the scope defined by their Department Head.
- Authorized Approvers must ensure transactions comply with University policies and procedures, applicable laws and regulations.
- Authorized Approvers must only approve transactions that are accurate, reasonable, and supported by documentation.
- Authorized Approvers must verify that funds are available within the approved budget and are allowable and allocable under the appropriate funding source(s) as applicable.
- Authorized Approvers must confirm goods/services were received or performed before final payment is approved.
Specific financial systems may have built-in flexibility regarding the above internal controls.
Documentation Requirements
Approval Authority
A formal request is required to grant an individual approval authority of financial transactions within UConn’s financial systems. The request is initiated by the individual requesting approval authority or their supervisor. The request must be approved by the Department Head or the equivalent level of senior management and be sent to the IT or system administrator that oversees the applicable financial system and must include:
- The individual’s full name, NetID, and department.
- A description of the transactions for which approval authority is granted.
- Specific exclusions (e.g., dollar limits, goods/services, customers, vendors).
- The effective start and end dates (if applicable) of the approval authority.
Transactional Approval Documentation
Most UConn financial systems require the use of UConn email addresses or NetID to access the application and track approval actions through a routing log or activity history, documenting the date, time, and action performed.
For approvals permitted to exist outside of an electronic system, the Authorized Approver must sign and date their approval before the financial transaction progresses through the workflow.
PROCEDURES
Procedures regarding the implementation of this policy are available here. These procedures are adopted under the authority of the Executive Vice President for Finance and Chief Financial Officer, President or designee.
ENFORCEMENT
Violations of this policy and any related procedures may result in appropriate disciplinary measures in accordance with University By-Laws, General Rules of Conduct for All University Employees, applicable collective bargaining agreements, and the University of Connecticut Student Code.
POLICY HISTORY
Policy created: 05/29/2025 (Approved by the Senior Policy Council and President)
Revised Policies in May 2025
The Senior Policy Council and President have recently approved the following policy revisions:
Academic Program and Accreditation Review, Policy on
| Title: | Academic Program and Accreditation Review, Policy on |
|---|---|
| Policy Owner: | Office of the Provost |
| Applies to: | All Academic Programs at UConn |
| Campus Applicability: | All UConn Campuses |
| Approval Date: | April 17, 2025 |
| Effective Date: | April 18, 2025 |
| For More Information, Contact: | Vice Provost for Academic Affairs |
| Contact Information: | Provost@uconn.edu, 860-486-4037 |
| Official Website: | https://provost.uconn.edu/ |
BACKGROUND
Ensuring the highest standards of academic excellence is a core commitment of the University of Connecticut. Regular external evaluations provide an objective assessment of our academic programs, fostering continuous improvement and alignment with current educational standards and industry needs. Moreover, the New England Commission of Higher Education (NECHE) Standards for Accreditation require universities to engage in regular academic program reviews to ensure ongoing compliance with accreditation requirements and to uphold the quality and integrity of their educational offerings. The Academic Program Review also provides an opportunity to obtain feedback about the extent to which the academic unit has the resources needed to implement high-quality academic programs.
In addition to institutional accreditation, programmatic accreditation is essential in many fields to validate the required standards of educational programs that allow students to qualify for licensure and certification in professional fields. Generally, programmatic accreditation demonstrates external oversight of quality assurance for programs, reassuring students, employers, and other stakeholders that programs meet specified standards within a discipline or professional field.
PURPOSE
To establish a structured and systematic requirement for academic program review, including the periodic external evaluation of all academic programs at the University of Connecticut, to enhance program quality, promote accountability, and support strategic planning and resource allocation.
To ensure that programmatic accreditation, which can substitute for aspects of the academic program review process in part or in whole, has administrative oversight including formal procedures for seeking, maintaining, and documenting programmatic accreditation as established by the Office of the Provost.
APPLIES TO
This policy applies to all academic programs offered at the University, including undergraduate, graduate, and professional degree programs, including those offered by the Schools of Dental Medicine, Law, and Medicine.
DEFINITIONS
Academic Program: A combination of courses and related activities organized for the achievement of specific learning outcomes as defined by the University. This includes programming at both the undergraduate, graduate, and professional levels and consists of degrees, majors, minors, certificates, and concentrations. Requirements for awarding these programs are defined in the appropriate university catalog.
External Evaluation: A comprehensive review conducted by an external review team to assess the quality, effectiveness, and relevance of the academic program(s) undergoing review.
External Review Team: A group of experts outside of the University selected to conduct the evaluation of academic programs.
Programmatic Accreditation. Programmatic accreditation applies to specific academic disciplines and programs, ensuring they meet established quality standards, engage in continuous improvement, and fulfill reporting requirements. Academic units pursuing this specialized accreditation are responsible for maintaining compliance with disciplinary standards, implementing ongoing improvements, and submitting necessary reports to the recognized accreditor.
Recognized Accreditor: A private nongovernmental organization recognized by the Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA), or the U.S. Department of Education as able to review the quality of higher education institutions, academic units, or programs.
POLICY STATEMENT
All Academic Programs are required to undergo an External Evaluation at least once every eight (8) years. Academic Programs may seek an extension for no more than two (2) years. The Office of the Provost will establish the process for engaging academic units in the scheduled Academic Program review process, which will include engaging in a self-study process, producing a self-study report with supplementary information, hosting and facilitating a site visit with the External Review Team to ensure a thorough evaluation, and responding to the evaluation report.
For accredited programs, the accreditation review conducted by a Recognized Accreditor may fulfill some or all the University’s Academic Program External Evaluation requirements. To allow for this substitution, the University must maintain records of the Programmatic Accreditation process, status, and any related evidence or reports. In cases where the accreditation review does not cover aspects of the University’s Academic Program review process, the program may be asked to address those gaps to fully comply with the University’s Academic Program review standards.
ENFORCEMENT
Violations of this policy or related procedures may result in appropriate disciplinary measures in accordance with University By-Laws, General Rules of Conduct for All University Employees, Rules of Conduct, applicable collective bargaining agreements.
REFERENCES
New England Commission of Higher Education (NECHE) Standards for Accreditation
The following documents are available from the Academic Affairs Governance Document Library.
- Academic Program Review Handbook
- Academic Program Review Self-Study Guidelines
- Guidelines for Disciplinary-specific Accredited Programs
POLICY HISTORY
Policy created: 04/17/2025 (Approved by Senior Policy Council and President)
New Policy Approved in April 2025
The Senior Policy Council and President have recently approved a new policy:
Revised Policies in March 2025
The Senior Policy Council has approved the following policy revision, which is effective as of 3/19/25:
Revised Policies in December 2024
The President and Senior Policy Council have approved the following policy revisions, which are effective as of 1/1/25:
New and Revised Policies in August 2024
The President and Senior Policy Council have approved the following policies this month:
Outdoor Activities Policy
| Title: | Outdoor Activities Policy |
|---|---|
| Policy Owner: | Office of the Provost and Office of the Vice President for Student Life and Enrollment |
| Applies to: | Workforce Members, Students, Others |
| Campus Applicability: | Storrs and Regional Campuses |
| Approval Date: | August 20, 2024 |
| Effective Date: | August 21, 2024 |
| For More Information, Contact | Office of the Provost or Office of the Vice President for Student Life and Enrollment |
| Contact Information: | provost@uconn.edu or VPSLE@uconn.edu |
| Official Website: | https://provost.uconn.edu or https://studentlife.uconn.edu |
PURPOSE
To support a safe environment for the University community and our visitors and clarify the expectations, restrictions, and requirements related to the use of outdoor spaces, whether scheduled, unscheduled, active, or passive.
APPLIES TO
This policy applies to Students, Workforce Members and Visitors on the Storrs and Regional Campuses.
Jurisdiction: This policy applies to all outdoor facilities and spaces under the control of the University of Connecticut.
POLICY STATEMENT
Outdoor activities are permitted on University property provided they are held in accordance with all University policies and procedures, and relevant laws and regulations. The University has the authority to ensure outdoor activities comply with the following requirements:
- Prohibited Items and Practices
- Weapons or weapon facsimiles.
- Amplified or projected sound not in accordance with the Amplified and Projected Sound policy.
- Obstructing public access. Blocking access to public spaces or hindering anyone’s ability to enter or exit an area. A clear path of ingress and egress must always be maintained at all building entrances and exits, ADA ramps, stairs, and walkways, as well as for emergency vehicles.
- Camping or encampments.
- Ignitable paper, sky lanterns or other like luminaries that may present fire hazards.
- Outdoor Activity Disruption: No outdoor activity is permitted to disrupt another outdoor activity. To minimize/avoid disruption, University officials may direct one or more outdoor activities to relocate. Failure to comply with this or other directives will be considered a violation of University policies and subject to sanctions. Failure to comply may also be subject to law enforcement action, including criminal penalties.
PROCEDURES
For more information for scheduling outdoor events and procedures related to this policy, visit the InForm website.
ENFORCEMENT
Violations of this policy may result in appropriate disciplinary measures in accordance with University By-Laws, General Rules of Conduct for All University Employees, applicable collective bargaining agreements, and the University of Connecticut Student Code.
The Provost or designee and the Vice President for Student Life and Enrollment or designee shall review this policy annually and will recommend revisions and/or updates as may be appropriate.
Questions about this Policy may be directed to the Office of the Provost at provost@uconn.edu or the Office of the Vice President for Life and Enrollment at VPSLE@uconn.edu.
POLICY HISTORY
Policy created: 08/20/2024 (Approved by the Senior Policy Council and President)
Fitness for Duty Policy
| Title: | Fitness for Duty Policy |
|---|---|
| Policy Owner: | Human Resources |
| Applies to: | Employees |
| Campus Applicability: | Storrs and Regional Campuses |
| Approval Date: | August 20, 2024 |
| Effective Date: | August 21, 2024 |
| For More Information, Contact: | Human Resources |
| Contact Information: | (860) 486-3034 or hr@uconn.edu |
| Official Website: | https://hr.uconn.edu/ |
BACKGROUND
The University is committed to providing a workplace that is conducive to a safe and healthy environment, supportive of our educational mission. Employees must be able to perform their job duties in a safe, productive, and effective manner. Employees who are not Fit for Duty may present a safety risk for themselves or others.
PURPOSE
To ensure the health and safety of individuals in the University community and others with whom they have contact.
DEFINITIONS
Fit for Duty: An employee is physically, mentally, and emotionally capable of performing their job responsibilities effectively and safely.
Fit for Duty Evaluation: A professional assessment of an employee’s physical, mental, and/or emotional capacities carried out by a licensed Health Care Evaluator to determine whether the employee is physically, mentally, and emotionally capable of performing their duties. This may include a “functional capacity evaluation” (FCE), which is a set of tests, practices, and/or observations that are combined to determine the employee’s ability to safely perform the physical and other demands of their specific job.
Health Care Evaluator: An independent, licensed, health care provider with appropriate expertise to conduct a Fitness for Duty Evaluation.
POLICY STATEMENT
The University may conduct a Fit for Duty Evaluation with an independent, licensed Health Care Evaluator, where such an exam is job-related and consistent with business needs. This includes, but is not limited to, situations where an employee:
- has observable difficulty performing their duties safely, which may include situations in which the employee appears to be impaired by drugs, alcohol, or other substances;
- is returning from an intermittent or block medical leave, where there is a reasonable basis to verify the necessity of the leave or of the ability of the employee to return;
- has observable difficulty performing the essential functions of their position; and/or
- poses an imminent or serious safety threat to self or others.
This policy is not a substitute for the University’s policies and protocols regarding sick or medical leave requests, workers’ compensation claims, or reasonable accommodations and may be in addition to benefits processing, as legally and/or contractually permitted. It also is not a substitute for other University policies or procedures related to discipline, performance management, or prevention of violence in the workplace; nor is it a substitute for any requirements or regulations under the Connecticut Police Officer Standards and Training Council or Conn. Gen. Stat. § 7-291e, as may be amended from time to time, or other licensing boards.
Employee and Supervisor Responsibilities:
Employees:
- Must come to work Fit for Duty and must perform their job responsibilities throughout their workday.
- Must notify their supervisor as soon as possible if they feel they cannot safely perform their job. Employees are not required to disclose health-related information to their supervisor.
- Should notify their supervisor as soon as possible when they observe a co-worker acting in a manner that suggests the co-worker may be impaired or otherwise not Fit for Duty. If the supervisor is the individual of concern, the employee may inform the next level supervisor or contact Labor Relations at (860) 486-5684 or laborrelations@uconn.edu.
- Must provide relevant information or releases for medical records reasonably requested by the Health Care Evaluator conducting the Fit for Duty Evaluation.
- Must comply with authorized requests to submit to a Fit for Duty Evaluation. Non-compliance may constitute insubordination and result in disciplinary action, up to and including termination.
Supervisors:
- Are responsible for observing the attendance, performance, and behavior of employees under their supervision.
- Must follow this policy when presented with circumstances or knowledge indicating an employee may be not Fit for Duty.
- Must contact Employee Relations if they have a reasonable belief that an employee is unable to perform their job and may need a Fit for Duty Evaluation.
- Should contact the UConn Police Department first if there is an immediate safety concern or threat and thereafter make a referral to the Employees of Concern (“EOC”) Team. When there is not an immediate safety concern, the employee may nonetheless present a threat to themselves or others, make a referral to EOC.
Fit for Duty Evaluation:
- The Fit for Duty Evaluation will be conducted to determine whether the employee is physically, mentally, and emotionally capable of performing their job responsibilities effectively and safely. The Fit for Duty Evaluation is not for diagnosis or treatment.
- The examination may include medical testing, psychological testing, physical examination, or an FCE that may involve performance of actual physical tasks and duties.
- When the University requires a Fit for Duty Evaluation pursuant to this policy, the University shall select the Health Care Evaluator and bear the cost of the examination.
- Results from the University’s selected Health Care Evaluator shall be presumed valid. In case of significant disagreement or contradiction by the employee’s physician, the University may request another opinion, for which it will bear the cost.
Return to Work:
- The Health Care Evaluator will provide the appropriate University officials, including but not limited to Human Resources and Employee Relations, with a written report detailing the nature and extent of the employee’s functional limitations or restrictions concerning the employee’s ability to effectively safely perform the essential functions of their job, if any, and the expected duration of any such limitations.
- The Health Care Evaluator will make the final determination of an employee’s fitness for duty status based on their assessment of the employee and review of the essential functions of the employee’s position, based on their University job description and duties.
- The University must receive a written return to work/fitness for duty form from the Health Care Evaluator before the employee may return to work.
- Where applicable, Human Resources shall be consulted to facilitate the reasonable accommodation process. Nothing contained in this policy is intended to create a right to light duty work.
- If an employee is deemed unfit for duty, their employment status will be determined on a case-by-case basis in accordance with federal and state law, University policy and procedures, and any applicable collective bargaining agreement or employment contracts.
Confidentiality:
- Records of Fit for Duty Evaluations will be treated as confidential and will only be shared or used as permitted by law.
- Information concerning an employee’s fitness for duty will be shared only with those who need to know for legitimate business purposes. Typically, information available to the employee’s work unit after the Fit for Duty Evaluation will be limited to whether the employee is fit to resume their job duties and whether the employee needs specific reasonable accommodations, as determined by Human Resources.
ENFORCEMENT
Violations of this policy may result in appropriate disciplinary measures in accordance with University By-Laws, General Rules of Conduct for All University Employees, applicable collective bargaining agreements, and the University of Connecticut Student Code.
RESOURCES
Employee Assistance Program (EAP)
EAP Phone: (860) 679-2877, CT toll-free: 800-852-4392
Web: https://hr.uconn.edu/employee-assistance-program/
Provides confidential assessment and referrals for employees seeking assistance in dealing with alcohol and substance misuse.
If there is no emergency or imminent threat, employee concerns should be reported to Human Resources via laborrelations@uconn.edu.
If there is an imminent threat or an emergency situation, the University of Connecticut Police Department (UCPD) should be contacted immediately by dialing 911.
POLICY HISTORY
Policy created: 08/20/2024 (Approved by Senior Policy Council and the President)